Wednesday, July 13, 2022

POBB July 11, 2022

Pick of the Brown Bag
July 11, 2022
by
Ray Tate

Welcome to the Pick of the Brown Bag.  In this independent column, I review comic books as well as other media.  


Because the comic book Doctor Who is a spin-off of the longest running science fiction television series in the history of the medium, you’ll taste a sample of that versatility with this posting.  


If you’re looking for a quick decision on any of my subjects.  You’re better off checking me out on Twitter: #PickoftheBrownBag.


After you retrieve your booty from your friendly-neighborhood comic book store, I recommend that you tune in to the free Doctor Who audio broadcast Doctor Who “Redacted. 



That link will take you to BBC Sounds, which offers a lot of free podcasts as well as streaming music including the Glastonbury concerts.  


Anyhow, just stick in the word "Redacted," or "Doctor Who" in the search function.  Sorry for making you do more work than a Fox News pundit.  Trying to avoid broken, lost links.


The ten part story had me enthralled to very end.  The radio serial isn’t just a bit of fluff.  It’s authentic Doctor Who


Jodie Whittaker participates as the Doctor, along with some familiar voices from the show’s past and present. 


Incidentally, if you’re looking for the current Doctor Who series stream and you have no access to BBC America, join AMC+.  The new American home for Doctor Who.


By the way, I'm not getting paid in any way, shape or form from either industry.  I represent a public service to direct you to Doctor Who, a show that I love, and comic books worth reading.  Also trying to save you money by avoiding the bad ones.  That's all the Pick of the Brown Bag ever was and still is.



If you haven’t watched Doctor Who’s current season, you’ll still be able to enjoy the comic book which features the likeness of Jo Martin as the Doctor.  



Introduced in Jodie Whittaker’s Series Twelve as a mystery Doctor.  "The Fugitive of the Judoon" reprises her enigma in Series Thirteen, which comprises the Doctor Who serial "The Flux," now available on blu-ray.



By the by, a second viewing of "The Flux" especially with closed captions reveals a lot of good, solid science fiction and/or far-fetched technology introduced previously.  


There’s still some metaphysical tomfoolery regarding the nature of time, but the clutch of stories aren’t nearly as dumbfounding as they were the first time around.


"The Flux" further sheds light on The Division, an inscrutable organization also introduced in Series Twelve.  


The Division plays a big part in "The Flux."  The Doctor’s arch-nemesis The Master at the conclusion of Series Twelve reveals the Doctor worked for the Division, but they wiped out her memories of her association. 


That’s not really a new technique.  In fact it’s an oddball centerpiece of Doctor Who.


The Time Lords are aliens that live on the planet Gallifrey.  They forswore interfering in other cultures’ development except in the  rarest of occasions.  As a result they gave up casual time travel.  


The Doctor disagreed with his people.  So, he and his granddaughter Susan steal a faulty, decommissioned TARDIS to leave Gallifrey.  



The show gives many other reasons why the Doctor and Susan steal the TARDIS, but one remains steadfast.  The Doctor and Susan wanted to explore the space-time continuum in total freedom.


In Patrick Troughton’s final Doctor Who serial “The War Games,” the Doctor has no choice but to reveal himself to the Time Lords who eventually punish him for his crimes against Gallifrey.  Two of which include interference with other cultures and the theft of a TARDIS.  



The Tom Baker serial "The Deadly Assassin" indicates the Celestial Intervention Agency, perhaps the governmental Gallifreyan face of Division, intervened on the Doctor’s behalf.  


The Time Lords strike a bargain with the Doctor and use him as their operative, for those aforementioned rare occasions, as evidenced in the Colin Baker era episode “The Two Doctors.” 



What happens in between the "second" Doctor Patrick Troughton and "third" Doctor Jon Pertwee eras of Doctor Who is anybody’s guess.  



Suffice to say, Jon Pertwee as the Doctor now carries out the original sentence imposed by the Time Lords.  A new face.  Confined to the planet earth.  Although, curiously, they have rewarded him with legal ownership of the TARDIS he originally stole.  The Time Lords furthermore alter the Doctor’s memory so he cannot operate so much as the TARDIS’ flashing light atop its police box shell.  In one episode, the Doctor manages to transport himself into a pile of dust bins.  No.  This Doctor isn't going anywhere.


Now, we get to Jo Martin who retroactively predates William Hartnell’s first Doctor.  


This Doctor, whom we know little about, operated with greater knowledge of The Division.  At some point she becomes just as much as a fugitive as the Doctor we know and the Division obliterates her memory, not just alters it.



So, William Hartnell’s Doctor truly believes himself to be the first, the original.  As he often mentions. 


Reality Break


It’s somewhat unfortunate that show runner Chris Chibnall created this schism.  Doctor Jo Martin would have fit nicely in between Patrick Troughton’s and Jon Pertwee’s times as the Doctor.  It irritates me when people don’t take the simpler solution and instead create friction.  On the bright side, nothing in his treatment conflicts with the Doctor being “half-human, on his mother’s side.”  So, I’ll take what I can get.


Fiction Resumes


Jody Houser takes on the so-called fugitive Doctor.  I’m against this label because most of the Doctor’s life has been one of a fugitive.  Why she should be singled out is beyond me.  


Nevertheless, this is mostly unexplored territory, but Houser’s  characterization of the Doctor rings true.  She's also trying to balance out the Doctor as an operative for the somewhat lawful evil Division and as the Doctor we know.  It's not an enviable task, but she manages it with aplomb.


The story begins at the finish of a previous adventure with the Doctor teaming up with a Weeping Angel.  The Division uses any species to get the job done, including the Doctor's traditional enemies.  So, a truce is established.



The vignette which works as a short-short story smoothly segues to the Doctor's new mission and new companion, Taslo.


Perhaps because of Taslo's similarity to Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Rupert Giles shows up to handle the Doctor's and Taslo's mission.



Taslo by the way is a Time Lord, and Time Lord names are cumbersome.  It must be in their Constitution and some old asses from the Time Lord Council refuse to change it.  So Taslo is probably short for something like Taslocresceanumean.  Every Time Lord no matter class or status shortens his name or assumes a nick-name.



The Division want wholesale genocide of the cult that offends them.  To that effect, they issue the Doctor a ton of weapons to do the job.  What's hilarious is that they actually thought the Doctor would drop a bomb, no questions asked.


In the best example of Houser's balance between the Division's Doctor and our Doctor, the Doctor investigates rather than instigates.   


Being true to the Doctor's ideals, the Doctor does something quite Doctorish that will delight fans of the series.


The move does however put Taslo on notice.  The Doctor isn't so much working for the Division, but using the Division for her own ends.  A nice bit of insight from Houser.


If we accept that the Doctor is still the Doctor though perhaps more proactive, we may argue the hypothesis that she uses the Division's vast resources to better pin-point threats to the universe.  Ones that she can then thwart in her own way.


The Doctor and Taslo land on the planet they were meant to blow up, and it's here where in issue two, they meet the peaceful species that the Time Lords and/or/nor Division want to exterminate.


The second issue explores the question why.  Why do the Time Lords and/or/nor Division consider these fellows a threat? The aliens greet the Doctor and Taslo with open arms.



Some may be reminded of the myth of Thanksgiving.  It's not a bad comparison.  The Division sent the Doctor and Taslo to murder innocent people.  The people invite them to dinner and try to make friends.


Taslo as you can see cannot believe the Doctor's willingness to give the aliens the benefit of doubt.  This gibes with the idea of the Doctor's legend of being The Oncoming Storm.  Eventually, Taslo comes around.



Though not at first.  Taslo demonstrates fealty to the Time Lords in a similar way all the Time Lords seem to trust the ruling body throughout all but the recent episodes of the series.  



Though the Time Lords may have once been quite good.  Even the Doctor admits this in "War Games," they become much more corrupt as the series progresses.


Perhaps one shouldn't blame the Time Lords and instead look to the writers being exposed to corrupt governments all over the real world, but where's the fun in that?



Gallifrey apparently only has one golden age of government after "The War Games."  That occurs after Collin Baker's Doctor faces "Trial of a Time Lord."  Though it's not the gist of the episode, we learn that insurrectionists are using the Trial as a distraction to overthrow Gallifrey's current government.  Presumably this era lasts until the final days of Paul McGann's Doctor.


Taslo finally regrets her actions and sees the light when the aliens targeted for extermination reveal not a secret, but something that just didn't come up in conversation.



These first two issues of the new Doctor Who series are quite entertaining, especially with the elegant and accurate art of Roberta Ingranata.  


I must admit to growing tired of Houser's multiple crossovers and reiterations with the Doctor and her past incarnations, but this new series has all the energy and originality of Houser's much more memorable non-gimmicky run of Doctor Who.


Tuesday, June 28, 2022

POBB Special The Fiendish Plot of Fu Man-Clarence

A Pick of the Brown Bag Special

The Fiendish Plot of Fu Man-Clarence

by

Ray Tate



Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! 



Clarence Thomas became instrumental in striking down a near fifty year old legal precedent.  


The latin phrase Stare decisis no longer pertains to law. 


Now, people in the LGBT community are terrified.  They should be.  


Thomas is just itching to overturn gay marriage rights and other protections of civil liberties.  He all but shouted this by stating Obergefell vs Hodges was “wrongly decided.”  Sound familiar?  


So, yes.  Your rights are about to suffer.  On the bright side, the High Court just put more guns on the street.  So, you may not suffer long.  Nobody may.



Clarence Thomas loathes people in general, but I suspect Thomas has a much more devious plan. 



Thomas intends to turn back the clock until he reaches the landmark decision: Loving vs. Virginia.  


Loving vs. Virginia legalized interracial marriage, but the Supreme Court only decided the case in 1967.  Do the math.  It’s only six years shy of Roe vs. Wade.  Its age cannot save it from the chopping block.


It probably hasn’t passed Thomas’ notice that the case is in fact called Loving vs. Virginia.  Virginia.  You can imagine the smile on his face.  



“How delicious the case actually references my wife’s name.”


Richard Loving married Mildred Jeter in Washington D.C.  However, Virginia still maintained a ban on interracial marriage.  When the Lovings moved to Virginia, authorities arrested them.  


Nowadays that sounds nuts, but hey, the law’s the law, baby.  The law does not rely on logic or science.  It may have once.  It now relies on the nuanced interpretation of Conservatism.



Anyhow, the State of Virginia as opposed to Ginni didn’t really want this mess.  They were happy being racist.  Why did this heathen couple have to come into town and upset everything?


The state threatened to punish the Lovings with one year in prison if they didn’t leave.  The Lovings not being stupid moved to Washington D.C. where they were previously married.  


Nevertheless, the Lovings sued Virginia, the State not Ginni.  After all what gives anybody the right to order somebody where to live?


Well, if the states start trying to control women’s movements, Thomas, the horse and buggy guy, the pipsqueak wannabe rapist, the Puritan and the sort-of-woman on the High Court will decide.  


Likely the decision will imprison women in each state.  Think of Hogan’s Heroes, only without the absurd successful sabotage.



Actually, think of the internment camps for Japanese Americans here in the U.S of A.


Ultimately, the Lovings’ case made it all the way to to the Supreme Court.  That’s right.   Virginia’s lower courts were racist dick enough to rule against the Lovings.


Now, we get to the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court.  Interracial marriage barriers violated the Fourteenth Amendment.


Boy, that unanimous ruling thing sounds enticingly bedrock doesn’t it? The then Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Roe vs. Wade.  7-2.  I don’t really believe a unanimous decision is going to impact on the current yahoos in the robes.  Do you?


So, what happens if the Supreme Court strikes Loving vs. Virginia off the books?  



Ginni Thomas finds herself on the curb waiting for the Trump Kool-Aid Man to show up for the last rally.  Oh, yeah!


Thomas maintained a pretense of Conservative impartiality throughout his tenure.  The press however exposed Ginni Thomas as a nutter who more than likely committed treason.  This coincidentally occurred around the time the Puritan’s draft opinion on Roe vs. Wade leaked out into the stratosphere.  


Thomas must have been thinking.  You know, this fruitcake isn’t really going to be good for me in the long run, and I’ve hated women all my life anyway.  It’s time to execute my contingency plan.


You see, Thomas can get a divorce.  The trouble is that Catholicism doesn’t recognize divorce.  As far as the Powers That Be are concerned, you’re still married even if the courts declare otherwise.  


You need to get a Catholic Annulment in order to be rid of the old ball and chain.  


That’s what this roadmap provides Thomas.  He cuts through the laws.  Wiping out precedent after precedent.  Until he reaches his ultimate goal.  Loving vs. Virginia. 





The precedent becomes eliminating precedent.


Expunging Loving vs. Virginia would erase Thomas’ marriage to Ginni.  He can say he married her when the law allowed such hedonistic tomfoolery.  So, legally he will no longer be bound to Ginni.  


All that’s necessary now is Catholic Annulment to totally divest himself of the Trump cultist.  


Thomas is a Trump cultist.  He just cannot be perceived in such a way.  He's also got a different colored robe than the other MAGAs.  


He's an upper echelon lunatic.  The one who can decide which virgin sacrifice will attract the least amount of police attention.


The annulment would be readily granted since the climate of the law and the United States would have changed.  


The Church would have to rethink things after the demise of Loving vs. Virginia.  


They would be much more lax with annulment than in the past.  You can imagine them granting annulments left and right.


This plan also allows Clarence Thomas to keep his entire fortune.   Approximately one million dollars.  That we know about. 


After all if he never married Ginni Thomas, he should not be obligated to pay her half of his earnings, nor alimony.  It would be as if he never even met her.


For this reason Democrats should work together with surprised, no doubt suspicious Republicans, to codify Loving vs. Virginia into law.  I’m sure they would get more votes for this over Roe vs. Wade and Obergefell vs. Hodges.  


Sure the crazy wing of the Republican Party wouldn’t vote in favor of Loving vs. Virginia, but even Rand Paul and Ted Cruz may not care so much.  


The consequences of codifying Loving vs. Virginia into law would preserve the marriages of millions of people, strike a blow against racism but also, and this is the important part, fuck up Clarence Thomas something fierce.


Thank you, I’m here all night.


Thursday, June 9, 2022

POBB June 8, 2022

Pick of the Brown Bag
June 8, 2022
by
Ray Tate 

Welcome to another brand spanking new Pick of the Brown Bag.  I'm Ray Tate, and I review comic books, prose novels and movies.  You however know the gist of the blog.  If not, stick around, and you'll find out.  This week, I'm looking at a doublet: Batgirls and X-Men.

One of the things I look for in a good comic book is whether or not you can just dive right into the story with little to no exposition.  Both of these books meet that criteria.  Somewhat.


Given my history with Batgirl, Batgirls is a book you may think I would be reading regularly.  Truth is.  I got a sample of it in Batman or Detective Comics and really didn't care for the style of art, which also emphasized Barbara Gordon's newfound green eyes.


They look like green marbles.  For somebody who knows better, they're blue, baby, blue, that's a lot of exposure to erroneous visuals.

They're Blue, Baby, Blue

Though, in general, I like the Spoiler, I never cared about Cassandra Cain.  The exception being when Jimmy Palmiotti and Amanda Conner took her out of that awful black formless costume and put her into something awesome.


They're Blue, Baby, Blue

There's only one tag for Cassie Cain, just to emphasize my loathing, but I'll make it easy for you.  Click here to see my review of Conner and Palmiotti's superb Birds of Prey and also glimpse the gorgeous costume they designed.


They're Blue, Baby, Blue

What's interesting is that artists Jorge Corona and Sarah Stern are really beneficial to Cassie Cain's traditional ink upchuck gear.

As you can see they create a number of striking contrasts that highlight the black and the shape of the figure.  Very few artists ever did that with Cassie Cain.  She always just looked like a thumbprint smudge somebody shaped into a sort of bat as an afterthought.

Primarily I bought this issue of Batgirls for the emphasis on the one and only Batgirl.  


Barbara Gordon in modern costume with a bat cowl and not the Linda Turner Black Cat styled mask.  Furthermore, since the modern costume opts for slits covering her eyes, I don't have to worry about the green ones.

It's through Corona's and Stern's depiction of the genuine Batgirl  I started to see just how good they are.  And baby, she's all over this.  She's in action as Batgirl for seven pages.  As Barbara Gordon only two.


It's those green eyes.  Really.  I hate them.  I'm ecstatic that the New 52 granted Babs mobility, but the green eyes, which appeared after the modern Batgirl of Burnside run, repel me.  


They're Blue, Baby, Blue

Not real green eyes.  Let me emphasize.  I have no issue with a person that has green eyes.


However, the biologist in me says you can't just magically change somebody's eye color on a whim.  That said I'm willing to put up with the offense, if she's Batgirl, not Oracle.  There's a difference.  A huge difference.  

Having good experiences with Becky Cloonan's writing in the Southern Cross, I suspected this would be well-written and Batgirl positive.  I was not disappointed.



Cloonan teams up with Michael Conrad to relate an action-based story that turns Gotham City into a 90s post-apocalyptic hellhole complete with robo-hitmen hired by Simon Saint.


You may be asking.  Who's Simon Saint?  


Nope.  Not him.  Not even close.  Although I'm sure somebody thought Simon Saint was a good alliterative villain's name because of the infamous Simon Templar.  


You can just see the thought process.  

"Simon.  Simon Samuels.  Simon Sophie.  No! Simon Saint!"  
"That sounds amazing!"
"I know.  It just hit me!"
"Sink me, you're a poet!"

Simon Saint is the Big Bad that nobody cared about in the Batman titles.  Some creator, with a poor memory, introduced him somewhere at sometime during the Infinite Frontier era of DC Comics.  Not exactly a reboot of Rebirth or the New 52, but not exactly a harmless redefinition either.  

That's all right though.  Even if you're not quite sure what's going on, and you're really not likely to during the second half, Babs is tearing through garbage on her motorcycle and demonstrating just how smart she is.


That's really all I look for in a Batgirl book.  That and blue eyes.  Alas.  Two out of three.


The other book I want to draw your attention to is X-Men number 10.  If you'e an All-New Wolverine Laura Kinney fan, this book is for you.  


Seriously.  WTF?

Now, if you haven't been keeping up with the many, many         X-Men titles, that's all right.  You know as well as I do, no X-Men book will ever make any sense to somebody that hasn't been along for that ride since the very beginning.  And I don't mean either the Stan Lee/Jack Kirby originals, the Thomas/Neal Adams run, nor the Byrne/Claremont era.  If anything, the X-Men have gotten weirder, and not in a good way.


The X-Men books started to go off the rails when Storm shaved her head and started wearing tight leather.  Coincidental redhead, Madeline Pryor showed up.  Scott Summers who grieved to all hell for the doomed Jean Grey fell for her, and he wasn't a dick for doing that.  However, you still could read The Uncanny X-Men with little threat of brain damage.  

So, I advise you to skip the first page.  That's just X-Men type nonsense.  Simply accept that something mutant-like brought Laura Kinney back from the dead and everything's good now.

"Wait? Laura died? When did she die?" 

Not even important.  At some point, she died.

"Okay, but even if she's a clone of a clone, she shouldn't have the memories of--"

Shhh...It's just a comic book.  Relax.

Rogue on the second page may convince you to read it, I don't advise that.  Skip the confusing dialogue and narration.  Just enjoy the beautiful rendition of Rogue by Javier Pina and Marte Garcia.  She's not here for just eye candy.  She becomes a crucial player later in the story with a nostalgic move that paints her as a hero.


The main plot begins on page five.  That's when you see Laura suiting up to go investigate adamantium on the Big Bad's base.


"Wait.  Who is the Big Bad?"

 
No idea.  Some red guy.

This guy's identity is immaterial to Laura attempting to discover the mystery of the adamantium/mutant signal.

The rest of the story spotlights Laura as Wolverine doing what she does best.


We see her tracking.


We see her stealthy. 

We see her clawing to where she hopes her cloned sister Gabrielle Kinney alias Honey Badger lies imprisoned.


It's not Honey Badger.  

I'll not spoil the surprise because the infused adamantium identity of the occupant in the box is a classic X-Men character that you could have encountered multiple ways, even outside the higgledy-piggledy of X-Men continuity.  

No, it's not Logan.


In addition to all of this Laura Kinney goodness ably choreographed by Pina as if X-Men were a Mission Impossible episode, we have a philosophical conflict.


Laura is a clone of Logan the original Wolverine.  Logan as many can point out was a Canadian intelligence officer who was turned into an adamantium-clawed killing machine code-named Weapon X.  I know.  Canada seems so nice.  In the Marvel Universe, they are real bastards.  

The fact is that even though Wolverine is really good at killing with those claws of his, he grew extremely dissatisfied.  He left Canadian Intelligence, became a hero in the X-Men and eventually stopped murdering everything in his longer reach.  Mostly.  

Laura was Weapon X-23.  Another Canadian import.  I know.  They seem so nice.  She realized her ethical dilemma much earlier than Wolverine.  And has since sworn off killing with a much more reliable track record than her genetic stock.  That doesn't stop Pina beautifully beating out a fight sequence where Laura also makes use of her super cool foot claws.  

So, if you're a fan of Laura Kinney.  This one is the exception that proves the rule.